Skip to main content

Proper Title Formatting (Ad Rejection Reason)

Updated this week

One of the most common reasons for a native ads campaign to be rejected is an improper title.

To help our advertisers write great titles that convert well and comply with our recommended best practices, we've created a GPT which can be used here.

Examples of good vs bad titles can be found below as well:

✅ Good Titles (engaging, clear, Web3-relevant)

  1. Own a Piece of the Metaverse Before It’s Too Late

  2. Secure Your Crypto with Next-Gen Wallet Technology

  3. Discover the DAO Changing How Communities Invest

  4. Trade NFTs Like a Pro — Beginner’s Guide Inside

Why they work:

  • Directly relevant to crypto/Web3 audiences.

  • Clear benefit or hook without overpromising.

  • Action-oriented language (“Earn,” “Discover,” “Trade”).

  • Evoke curiosity while setting correct expectations.

❌ Bad Titles (too vague, clickbait, irrelevant, misleading, or non-compliant)

  1. You Won’t Believe This New Investment Opportunity (too vague, classic clickbait)

  2. Get Rich Overnight with This Crypto Secret (misleading, violates ad policies)

  3. MetaMask - Web3 Wallet (not formatted like a blog post title)

  4. Best Thing on the Internet Right Now (not Web3-specific, lacks clarity)

  5. CLICK HERE for the Future of Money (spammy, low trust signal)

  6. Lose Weight While Trading NFTs (irrelevant, nonsensical)

Why they fail:

  • Too generic or could apply to any industry.

  • Misleading or unrealistic claims hurt credibility and compliance.

  • Overly sensational tone lowers trust.

  • Irrelevant combinations confuse the target audience.

Did this answer your question?